NTSB Update Highlights Questions About Remote-Control Trains

A tragic incident occurred in Walbridge, Ohio, where a CSX worker, Fred Anderson, was killed by remote-control locomotives in a rail yard. This raises significant safety concerns about the increasing use of remote-control operations, primarily seen as a cost-saving measure for railroads, where fewer experienced workers operate trains. Following the accident, the National Transportation Safety Board began investigating, especially focused on safety protocols surrounding remote-control operations. The primary demand for change is a return to two-person crews, a practice that was once standard but has shifted to a single-operator system. Advocates, including Anderson's coworker, believe that having two crew members would enhance safety, as one could focus on operating while the other could oversee the yard for hazards. Union representatives have expressed grave concerns about remote-control systems extending outside secured rail yard environments, increasing risks of encounters with pedestrians and vehicles. Critics emphasize that proper oversight and human presence are crucial for safety, especially given the limitations of remote controls. Experts in transportation safety argue for a reevaluation of these practices and advocate for more robust safety measures, including potentially mandating two-person crews to avoid similar tragedies. As the rail industry continues to explore technological advancements, it must balance modernization with a commitment to worker safety and public security.