Cookies
We use essential cookies for authentication and security. With your permission, we also use analytics to improve the product.Learn more
F1 Drivers Cry Out for Relief from Dominant Energy Management
Mar 28, 20262 min readRoad & Track (All)

F1 Drivers Cry Out for Relief from Dominant Energy Management

The Japanese Grand Prix weekend has added fuel to the debate over the 2026 Formula 1 regulations, with drivers expressing their frustration with the dominant energy management system. The first two races in Australia and China saw great wheel-to-wheel racing at the front, but as the season progresses, concerns about qualifying have come to the forefront.

The biggest issue is qualifying, which has transformed into a game of three-dimensional chess where speed in certain areas can penalize you due to energy depletion. Drivers must now carefully manage their energy levels to avoid losing speed on the straights and maintain pace through the corners.

A classic circuit like Suzuka really highlighted these issues, despite a small tweak to the energy usage regulations designed to improve matters and reduce reliance on superclipping, which causes cars to harvest energy while on full throttle. The change did make things better, but not by enough.

F1 Drivers Cry Out for Relief from Dominant Energy Management - image 2

Drivers were still running out of energy and losing speed on key sections like the run to the chicane and the classic Esses section, where they took it only with ICE power and no electrical energy. This pedestrian feel was evident in many drivers' qualifying performances.

Williams driver Carlos Sainz described his experience in qualifying, stating that the more he pushed, the slower he went. He noted that he spent more time full throttle due to his aggressive cornering style, which led to a loss of speed on the straights.

Sainz's comments were echoed by other drivers, who expressed their disappointment with the current system. They felt that it was stifling driver creativity and pushing them to adopt a more calculated approach.

Lando Norris acknowledged that qualifying at Suzuka is still challenging, but not as demanding as previous years. He noted that while the lap times are close, the drop in speed on the straights is noticeable, with 56 kph differences between poles from last year.

Norris also highlighted the importance of taking risks and pushing the limits on a track like Suzuka. However, he conceded that the current system makes it harder to achieve the same level of excitement as previous seasons.

Fernando Alonso was even more adamant that the challenge has gone away, stating that drivers must adapt to the new regulations. He emphasized the need for change and called for a review of the energy management system.

The debate over the 2026 Formula 1 regulations continues, with drivers crying out for relief from the dominant energy management system. The need for innovation and creativity in qualifying is clear, and it remains to be seen if the FIA will take action to address these concerns.

EazyInWay Expert Take

The current regulations are stifling driver creativity and pushing them to adopt a more calculated approach.

formula 1energy management2026 regulationsjapanese grand prixqualifying issues
Share this article

More in Automotive